Involvement of the date of composition of the letters of Paul and the Gospels?
What implications does the date of composition of the letters Paul and the Gospels of Mark, Matthew, Luke and John have for our understanding of the developing believe about the divinity of Jesus?
Theologians Liberals want to explain the divinity of the Savior as a belief in progress, but have to ignore the internal evidence of the New Testament to do so. For example, the conjecture that Christians of the first century Jews could not have Jesus worshiped because of their belief in monotheism. However, the belief in "God the Father" identified as "El-Elyon" or "God" is an ancient Hebrew tradition. And the Lord, being the Son of God and the creator of the world that also contained ancient Jewish tradition. (see "The Great Angel" A study of one God of Israel by Margaret Barker) Jehovah of the Old Testament is the same as the Lord and the New Testament Kyrios. New Testament evidence testifies that Jesus is the Holy Messiah. The idea of the divinity of Jesus is a further development of Christianity is questioned considering the first century, independent of Paul's letters and testimony. (see Romans 1:3-4) Using the rabbi and the Gnostic texts that were written two or three centuries AD, are less reliable in understanding the Jewish Christian beliefs rely on background information of the latest travel documents the Dead Sea.
The Gospel of Philip 1/5
